You mean in practice or in theory? Because with any political party, the outcome is always different.
Answer:
Advantages of the North:
- Population: the North had 22 million people at the start of the civil war, while the south had 9 million, less than half. This proved crucial because it allowed the North to field larger armies over a longer period of time (especially when soldiers began to die in large numbers).
- Industry: the North was industrializing, while the South was essentially agricultural. This meant that the North had better supply lines, more railways, and more factories.
- Leadership: most historians agree that Abraham Lincoln was a far more effective leader than Jefferson Davis.
The South had many disadvantages and most historians agree that winning the war for the Confederacy was practically impossible, however one advtange the South had was:
- Territory: the Confederacy was vast, rural, the climate was hot and humid, and tropical diseases were common. The northern soldiers had it harder to adapt to this conditions, and the North had to invade the vast territory while the Confederacy only had to defend.
It should be noted that the material used to create the plaque best reflects how Trade networks continued to flourish and gave Europeans direct access to precious luxury goods in the Indian Ocean region in the period 1450-1750.
According to this question, we are to discuss about material used to create the plaque in the Indian Ocean region in the period 1450-1750.
- As a result of this we can see this we can see that this material reflect how the network of trade bring about great economy and access to luxury by Europeans.
Therefore, material used to create the plaque best reflects Trade networks continued to flourish and gave Europeans direct access to precious luxury goods.
Learn more about Indian Ocean region at;
brainly.com/question/12479678
The answer is D. You really don't know about 9/11?
The sailed off from England, eventually landing in Cape Cod
