Explanation:
How did southern democrats reverse gains made during reconstruction in education?
- By spending for public schools was cut. And many schools closed.
How did southern democrats reverse gains made during reconstruction in segregation?
- Democrats reintroduced segregation laws, which blacks and whites separated in public.
How did southern democrats reverse gains made during reconstruction in voting rights?
- Because southern states required citizens pay all poll tax and pass a literacy test in order to vote. Both exclude many African Americans from voting.
Toussaint L'Ouverture was a French general, but instead for France, he fought for Haiti and its people, leading the Haitian Revolution against the French. Under L'Ouverture, the Haitians got much better organized. He was a military general, so he was very smart in warfare, tactically strong, and knew the weaknesses of the French troops. This led to him being able to lead the Haitians to successful battles for freedom, but also to wisely retreat them when the situation was not suitable for them and save their lives. He was the most important person when it came to the gaining of independence of Haiti, and rightfully so he is considered the father of this nation.
He was the governor of calafornia. I hope this helps! God bless.
The correct answer is that what led the Soviet Union to establish the Warsaw Pact was that West Germany joined NATO in 1955.
The Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance, better known as the Warsaw Pact, was a military cooperation agreement signed on May 14, 1955 by the countries of the Eastern Bloc. Designed under the leadership of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), its express purpose was to counteract the threat of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and in particular the rearmament of the German Federal Republic, to which the Paris Agreements allowed to reorganize their armed forces and join the NATO. The Pact was dissolved on July 1, 1991.
The answer would be Logos. This is a kind of appeal to reason or logic. When using this kind of appeal, it uses facts and evidence to persuade a the listener of the strength of your argument. This is different from pathos, which is an appeal to the emotions, whereas, ethos, from its word, uses ethics or credibility of the person making the argument.
