Answer:
You probably should have gave them 2/3 of what they did. I wouldn't call you a scammer, but it was not fair.
Answer:
Nicole is more expansive
Step-by-step explanation:
x for Rhonda replaced by 2 = 21. X for Nicole replaced by 2=24
Answer:
56% ≤ p ≤ 70%
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following :
Predicted % of votes to win for candidate A= 63%
Margin of Error in prediction = ±7%
Which inequality represents the predicted possible percent of votes, x, for candidate A?
Let the interval = p
Hence,
|p - prediction| = margin of error
|p - 63%| = ±7%
Hence,
Upper boundary : p = +7% + 63% = 70%
Lower boundary : p = - 7% + 63% = 56%
Hence,
Lower boundary ≤ p ≤ upper boundary
56% ≤ p ≤ 70%
Given:
1 set requires 4 couples 8 dancers.
Total number of people at a square dance = 250.
To find:
The greatest number of sets possible at the dance.
Solution:
We have,
Total people = 250
1 set = 8 people.



Number of possible sets cannot be a decimal or fraction value. So, approx. the value to the preceding integer.

Therefore, the number of possible sets at the dance is 31.