Answer:
Jess Bhamra is an 18-year old girl who is crazy about football but is prohibited from playing it due to being born into a traditional indian family which forbids girls from such activities. Jules Paxton is another 18 year old who is born in an English family. One day, they cross paths and Jules gets to know about Jess' talent in football. She invites Jess to a football team for women, coached by Joe. Seeing her talent, Jess gets accepted into the team. However, Jess' parents get to know about her playing football behind their backs. They forced her to stop playing and later, the football team gets into an important final. Joe requests Mr. Bhamra to let Jess play but was denied since it was on the same day as Jess' sister's wedding. Thankfully, Jess was allowed to take part in the competition halfway through the wedding. Unfortunately, when she arrived, their team was on the losing end. The scores were 0-1 and then 1-1. When there came a free kick, Jess bent the ball around the other players and lead her team to victory. A University in California offered soccer scholarships to Jess and Jules considering their outstanding performance and invites them to the University. Jess convinced her parents to let her go abroad and she takes off with Jules. They send team photos to their families now and then.
Answer:
I dont think this is right but I think that people should studies
Answer:
The answer is either A. or C.
Explanation:
<em>“The starving time” was the winter of 1609-1610, when food shortages, fractured leadership, and a siege by Powhatan Indian warriors killed two of every three colonists at James Fort.</em>
<em />
Good information here:
https://historicjamestowne.org/history/history-of-jamestown/the-starving-time/
(It is a little gory)
Hope this helps, good luck.
Answer:
Marius Robinson's transition is more accurate, but Frances Gage's version is more exciting and memorable.
Explanation:
Although both versions try to reproduce the same speech and spread the same message, Frances Gage's version is more exciting and memorable. This is because while Marius Robinson wanted to try to represent the speech in its entirety, using almost the same words as Truth, meanwhile Frances Gage modernized the speech, adapted it to be more consistent with the current language and modified the construction of several sentences, to make a more appealing strong to pathos and thus effectively move the feelings of the public. Although Frances Gage's version is not the most accurate and accurate, Gage's adaptation was very effective in allowing this discourse to be understood and debated today.