Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Korematsu v. United States occurred when Korematsu an American son of Japanese immigrants refused to leave his residence, when the American government decided to relocate all Japanese and Japanese descendants to concentration camps during World War II.
Korematsu claimed to be an American citizen and that his constitutional rights were being denied, but it was decided that the US government was free to give the military the power to nullify any civil and constitutional rights in times of war if that were a necessity for the US security.
Answer:
President: The President could choose to veto Congress' bill and publicly state that the reason it is doing so is due to the violation of the Constitution.
Supreme Court: If a lawsuit was filed about the law if it passed, the Supreme Court could review it and decide it was unconstitutional.
Answer:
by a threat of a veto two ways i dont know i found this try it hope it helps
Explanation:
The President, however, can influence and shape legislation by a threat of a veto. By threatening a veto, the President can persuade legislators to alter the content of the bill to be more acceptable to the President. Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate.
When a contract is broken, the concept of mitigation of damages comes into play. It indicates that after the other party breaches a contract, the non-breaching party might be obligated to take action to lessen their damages.
<h3>Give a brief account on Mitigation of damages.</h3>
Damages Mitigation is a type of legal defence frequently used in contract or tort law. The theory of avoidable consequences, as it is often known, is the idea that an injured party cannot be reimbursed for irrational costs incurred as a result of their harm if such costs could have been avoided with reasonable effort.
a. The following information explains if it is acceptable to demand "mitigation of damages": In any situation, it makes sense to mitigate damages since it encourages appropriate action to reduce the amount of loss sustained.
b. The following information explains contract and obligation breaches caused by wrongdoing: The party will not be obligated to the specific contract in the event of a violation. In this case, the individual erred and the other party broke the contract. As a result, since there is no contract, there are no obligations between the parties.
c. The following information explains if the landlord is required to look for a new tenant before the contract expires : In this instance, the landlord is able to prevent the loss brought on by the tenant's violation. Therefore, the landlord has a duty to find another renter before the end of the contract in order to prevent those losses.
To know more about, mitigation of damages, visit :
brainly.com/question/28190796
#SPJ1
