Answer: Where sovereignty is left to the people to decide
Sovereignty is the idea of the people in the government.
The answer to this question is false
A major reason they were disappointed with behaviorism is that only examined psychological processes that were observable.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
behaviorism?</h3>
Generally, One of the primary reasons for their dissatisfaction with behaviorism was that it focused only on observing psychological processes that were open to observation.
In conclusion, the idea is that human and animal behavior can be described in terms of conditioning, independent of any appeal to ideas or emotions and that the most effective treatment for psychiatric illnesses is the modification of pattern-based behavior.
Read more about behaviorism
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes, language and culture would be different, daily life not necessarily so.
Explanation:
If the Spanish had overtaken the Jamestown colony, and had expanded from there to other parts of North America, they would have sent settlers from Spain to promote their language and religion: Spanish and Christian Catholicism, respectively.
The U.S. would still be a Western Nation, but more similar to Latin America than it is right now.
Daily life would not necessarily be that different. The country would have likely industrialized, and then, become a service-based economy, meaning that most people would have more or less the same lifestyle and jobs that they have today.
The term Phillip Converse coined about how many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly, is known as "Non-Attitudes."
Phillip Converse was known for being a Political Science Professor at the University of Michigan.
In one of his research which he documented in a book titled "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Public."
He concluded that normal people who are not political elites don't ideologically take policies but rather flow with the prevailing issues.
Therefore he described these people as "non-attitude" because they don't have the attitude of a typical politician.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Phillip Converse defined "non-attitudes" as many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1470181
