1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
13

Do you think we are to dependent on computers/cell phones, why or why not?

English
2 answers:
iren2701 [21]3 years ago
4 0
We are not “too” dependent on electronics as of right now because we live among generations that lives before the era of technology and we have learned to be self sufficient from them. As generations pass, the need for electronics and technology will rise and we will eventually raise a generation that doesn’t know life outside of electronics.
algol133 years ago
3 0
Yes we use them for necessities everyday
You might be interested in
Neeed hellllllpppp pleasssssseeee
allsm [11]

Answer:

You're correct

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hello please help i’ll give brainliest
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

The flim's director and producer, they would be reacting to reviews on their movie

Explanation:

Please mark me brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Individuals have little effect on the overall health of the economy
Art [367]

It is false that individuals have little effect on the overall health of the economy

<u>Explanation:</u>

Individuals have little effect on the overall health of the economy is an incorrect statement. This is mainly because the relationship between health and economy is severe and powerful, and so are its effects.

Financial continuity of various health systems depends very much on individuals. The economy can perform well only when there is a proper interaction and function between health, economy and its financing policies. Any shift on either of them can have an adverse effect.

5 0
4 years ago
Is sameness in the giver good
Andrej [43]
Yes it is in the giver good
6 0
3 years ago
Argue for or against the limitation of speed limits.
Ipatiy [6.2K]
Since this is an opinion question you can take it either way.

Pros:
 - lower speed may cause lower speed accidents, which are less deadly         than their high speed alternatives
 - lower speed could potentially allow people to get lost less often because        they are able to navigate and respond earlier
 <span>- gas savings from optimal operating conditions                                            (between 88.5 - 96.5 km/h [55-60 mph])</span>

Cons:
 - longer commute times
 - less enjoyable (if you enjoy driving fast)
 - may contribute to overall congestion and increase in accidents as              people spend more time on average on the roads

Either way, support our opinion and you'll be right.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • #6 Examine the graphic below. The words on the left correspond to the definitions on the right.
    7·1 answer
  • What literary device is being used here?
    15·1 answer
  • When evaluating a narrator's credibility, a reader should consider
    13·2 answers
  • Which passage from "The Nose" best shows Major Kovalev as arrogant and self–absorbed?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the meaning to the word conveys
    12·2 answers
  • Describe a theme that the author develops through these two excerpts. Then analyze how the two excerpts interact and build on on
    9·1 answer
  • To analyze how historical setting is important to the characters in The Land, the reader should look for the major ideas that ar
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes King's dream?
    6·2 answers
  • Plz help me to do this activity 07
    14·1 answer
  • what is the connotive meaning of lifeless and faceless as it is used in these lines from creating a piece of sky
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!