Answer: True
Explanation:
Capital budgeting is the method used in the planning process in the organisations used to evaluate the long term project investing. Security analysis is the method of determining the proper value of debt, equity or hybrid securities of an organisation.
In simple words capital budgeting is an evaluation method and security analysis is the valuation method. Capital budgeting is done fro the data that is usually expected in nature whereas security analysis is done on the data which already exists in market.
Security analysis is done for valuing the securities thus the cash flows are given and we have to use that data for valuation purposes but in capital budgeting we can influence the cash flows as we have an objective to achieve .
Answer:
c. $125.00
Explanation:
Let us assume the x for invested in portfolio
Invested proportion × expected return of the optimal portfolio + (1 - invested proportion) × risk free rate = expected return
x × 7% + (1 - x) × 3% = 8%
7% x + 3% - 3% x = 8%
4% x = 5%
X = 1.25
Now the invested amount would be
= 1.25 × $500
= $625
So, the borrowed amount would be
= $625 - $500
= $125
According to conventional wisdom regarding asset allocation by age, you should hold a proportion of stocks equal to 100 minus your age. Therefore, if you are 40 years old, 60% of your portfolio should consist of equity. Criteria might be better changed to 110 minus your age or 120 minus your age because life expectancy increasing.
By deducting your present age from 100, you can utilize rule of thumb to determine your asset allocation. It implies that as you get older, you should shift away from equity funds and toward debt funds and fixed income assets in your asset allocation.
To learn more about asset allocation, click here
brainly.com/question/28025267
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. even if Ichiro was only slightly at fault.
Explanation:
If Ichiro is suing Heather for negligence, but he himself is found to have negiglent as well, his possibilities of winning the case are less even if he was only slightly at fault.
This is because the fact that he was negligent as well reduces his condition of victim, and makes him an active participant in the accident. In other words, if Ichiro is found negligent, it means that the accident and his subsequent injuries were also his fault.
