Answer:
x=2ln(2)/(2ln(2)-ln(3))
Step-by-step explanation:
ln(4^x-1)=ln(3^x)
(x-1)ln(4)=ln(3^x)
(x-1)ln(4)=xln(3)
ln(4)x-ln(4)=xln(3)
ln(4)x=ln(3)x+2ln(2)
2ln(2)x-ln(3)x=2ln(2)
(2ln(2)-ln(3))x=2ln(2)
Therefore, x=2ln(2)/(2ln(2)-ln(3))
8.75 if 35 is the total if 35 is the start then the answer is 140
A, it’s the move for that wuestion
Answer:
Sally is not right
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the two sequences which have their respective
terms as following:
Sequence A. 
Sequence B. 
As per Sally, there exists only one number which is in both the sequences.
To find:
Whether Sally is correct or not.
Solution:
For Sally to be correct, we need to put the
terms of the respective sequences as equal and let us verify that.

When we talk about
terms,
here is a whole number not a fractional number.
But as per the statement as stated by Sally
is a fractional number, only then the two sequences can have a number which is in the both sequences.
Therefore, no number can be in both the sequences A and B.
Hence, Sally is not right.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
