None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The colony’s economy depended on trade with Great Britain.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
During that time, most of the products of the Georgia were exported to <em>English Navy</em>. Also, England and West Indies were the most important market for trade o the Georgians. Other than trade, protection from the British government was another reason for slow support to <em>American Revolution. </em>
They didn’t believe the new-born country could protect them from <em>neighbouring threats of Spanish and French</em> from south and west respectively. They believed much in the protection of one of most powerful nations, England.
Answer:
Brainliest Please
Explanation:
It can tell us that Neanderthals were practical: perhaps they buried their dead so as not to attract scavengers or spare themselves the smell of a decomposing corpse. But it also tells us that they gave death the respect it deserves:
Neuropathy is a neurologic disorder that Mr.hatch might be at an increased risk for.
The answer is; begging the question.
<em>Hope this helped! :)
</em>
