1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Novay_Z [31]
2 years ago
9

HELP ASAP 15 points (please don't put random answers its rude) From 1855 to 1890, western settlement increasingly brought Americ

ans and American Indians into conflict with one another, especially on the plains. Analyze the causes and effects of these conflicts. (essay)
History
1 answer:
IrinaVladis [17]2 years ago
3 0

In the late nineteenth century, the US Army clashed with Native Americans, and ... they increasingly came into violent conflict with Native American Indians over ... especially after the discovery of gold in western territories sparked the Gold Rush. ... series of conflicts known as the Sioux Wars, which lasted from 1854 to 1890

You might be interested in
The picture below was taken in the early 1900s the conditions shown in the photograph or result of which of the following?
Ber [7]
D i think Hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the quotation by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Which of Adam Smith’s ideals are reflected in the quotation from Emerson? Greater com
masya89 [10]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

In the quotation, it says "The basis of political economy is non-interference." Saying that the government shouldn't interfere with the economy.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what portion of the U.S. Constitution deals exclusively with the establishment and powers of the Judicial Branch of government
german

The correct answer is Article III

8 0
3 years ago
Which action occurs in a presidential government but not in parliamentary <br> government
MakcuM [25]

Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.

The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.

Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the following terms
NARA [144]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. prevented panic withdrawals - D. Emergency Banking Act

2. work relief for states - A. Federal Emergency Relief Act

3. equality for farm prices - B. Agriculture Adjustment Act

4. improved business ethics - F. National Industrial Recovery Act

5. electrical power and soil conservation - C. Tennessee Valley Authority

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the Missouri compromise?
    8·1 answer
  • based on what you have read, select each group below whose equal rights were ensured by the civil rights act
    13·1 answer
  • Quick! Need the answer
    14·1 answer
  • the labor force statics and your knowledge of industrial growth and progressive reform what conclusion can you reach about wages
    14·2 answers
  • List the "Hogg Laws" and explain their purposes.
    11·1 answer
  • How was the Roman Empire most affected by political corruption?
    12·2 answers
  • Please Helpppp!!!
    6·2 answers
  • How would a modern map of the world differ from the
    7·1 answer
  • The law of demand explains that:
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following might a person pursue?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!