Interdependence is a mixed bag, many times it can rise powers up by having strong trade relationships that benefit both states, but it can also drag powers down if one of the states their interdependent with experiences serious problems. A more clear cut example would be if you were a member of a nation that imported the majority of it's food from another country. Then if that country had a famine from their bad agricultural practices, people in your country starve. There wasn't as broad of a network of interdependent states as we have today in the bronze age, so you couldn't just buy food from your other neighbor, you could be at war with them or maybe you don't even know of any other states where you could trade with. You can quickly see that if states are dependent on one and other, if one falls they can all topple like dominoes really quickly. Broader interdependence protects you from this more, but if a number of states that are interdependent experience problems, they can cause the entire world to fall into crisis. Good modern examples of this would be the 2009 financial crisis or the Great Depression.
The difference between anger and resentment stems from the way we come to feel these emotions. Anger and resentment are emotions that often go together. Anger refers to a strong feeling of displeasure. Resentment, on the other hand, is a feeling of bitterness that the individual experiences.
Answer:
B. Keep it, because it draws on evidence from the third paragraph to make a more persuasive case for why the North Cascades are a good place to resettle the goats.
Explanation:
Answer B
Correct. The underlined phrase shows how the environment of North Cascades National Park—the presence of salt licks and the relative lack of hikers—makes it less likely that the safety concerns discussed in paragraph 3 will arise in the North Cascades. With easier access to salt that does not come from humans, the goats will pose less of a threat to humans. By making this logical connection between the evidence in paragraph 3 and the passage’s case for the necessity of the goat relocation program, the writer makes the argument more persuasive.