At the mercy of god because that is what their naturalistic views were
If you come to the cabin this weekend, either we can<em> water-ski</em> or we can take a <em>canoe</em> out for some fish<span>ing.
</span>Incorrect,
If you come to the cabin this weekend, we can either go waterskiing or take a <em>canoe </em>out for some fishing.
<em>Incorrect, </em>
If you come to the cabin this weekend, either we can go waterskiing or take a <em>canoe</em> out for some fishing.
<span><em>Incorrect, </em></span>
If you come to the cabin this weekend, we can either <em>water-ski</em> or <em>fish </em>from a <em>canoe</em>.
<em>CORRECT </em>actions are constant.
Belief. a writers philosophical assumption refers to their belief of what is true based on knowledge of the subject.
The neighbours become even more suspicious of Les Goodman.
<h3>Explain your answer briefly?</h3>
The fragment is a story about the perception of one of Mr. Les Goodman's neighbors. In this account he expresses that Mr. Les Goodman had a strange demeanor when he said that "I saw Mr. Goodman here in the early hours of the morning standing in front of his house ... looking up at the sky
." According to this statement, it can be inferred that his neighbors are suspicious of this behavior by Mr. Les Goodman because it is not a common behavior.
Thus, The neighbours become even more suspicious of Les Goodman.
To learn more about Les Goodman. click here:
brainly.com/question/24159350
#SPJ1
These two lines reflect the theme that men must never go against fate:
1. "I don't know what the first two was, but the third was for death. that's how i got the paw"
2. He wanted to show that fate ruled people's lives, and that those who interfered with it did so to their sorrow. He put a spell on it so that three separate men could each have three wishes from it."
Explanation: The actual lesson that Fakir wanted to teach is that fate ruled people's lives.
