Answer:
good soil
Explanation:
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
ha
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
ha
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
ha
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
ha
Why were the Punic War so important for the development of the Roman Empire?
Government in the Middle Ages - Feudalism
The prevailing system of government in the Middle Ages was feudalism. Though the actual term “feudalism” was not used during the Middle Ages, what we now recognize as a feudalist system of government was in control in Medieval Europe. Feudalism was a way for the Kings and upper nobility to keep control over the serfs and peasants.
Definition
There is no universally accepted modern day definition of feudalism. The word “feudal” was coined in the 17th century, some 200 years after the end of feudalism in Europe. The term “feudalism” was coined later still, in the 19th century.
After the publication of Elizabeth A. R. Brown’s The Tyranny of a Construct, many scholars have found the term “feudalism” troubling and have wanted to drop it, not just as the title of government in the middle ages, but as a term altogether.
Feudalism is mainly used in discourse today as a comparison or analogical term applied to governmental structures in history. This is known as “semi-feudal.” The term has also been brought up in discussions of non-Western societies today whose governments resemble the feudal system in medieval Europe, but this use of the term is often deemed inappropriate.
The type of dwellings that a certain group of people has can tell a lot about the society of that particular group. In this case we have the Karankawas that had homes easy for transportation, and the Caddos that had permanent homes of heavier build.
We can conclude that the Karankawas were nomadic people that were constantly on the move. They have lived in areas that were not suitable for agriculture, so they were hunting and gathering in order to get the needed food. This means that the societies were not large, but consisted of smaller number of people, and the groups were made out of the extended family or few families.
The Caddos, on the other hand, were having sedentary life according to their dwellings. They most probably lived in area suitable for agriculture, so they produced their own food, thus having no need to change their location of living. The societies were larger and more complex, as it was possible with the surplus of food, but also practical for development, and defense in case it was needed.
<span>In the year 1784, Thomas Jefferson (third president of the United States of America) directed in the state of Virginia, USA the first ever controlled excavation of an olden burial mound. This is known to be the first scientific archaeological excavation in history. </span>
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Though the word "slavery" does not appear in the Constitution, the issue was central to the debates over commerce and representation. The "Three-Fifths Compromise" provided that three-fifths (60%) of enslaved people in each state would count toward congressional representation, increasing the number of Southern seats.
