What can be logically concluded about each option:
- <u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
- <u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
- <u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
- <em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
Answer: B. Robinson's final few years were marked in tragedy.
Answer:
B, emphasizes the thematic question of identity
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is the 3rd one I think. It sounds more formal than the rest of the themes.
Explanation:
Have a wonderful day!!
The option that best analyzes how the author develops the central idea across the paragraphs is: Alvarez explains that, although her parents reacted differently to the stress they endured, both became silent about the dictatorship.
<h3>What is a Dictatorship?</h3>
A dictatorship is a kind of rule in which the leader is strict and deals with the citizens in an autocratic manner.
Alvarez explained that in the Dominican Republic, Trujillo was a dictator and this impacted the citizens who were not to make statements in opposition to him. This also affected his parents who hardly spoke about the dictatorship.
Learn more about dictatorships here:
brainly.com/question/3710030
