Answer:
D. developmental milestones
Explanation:
Developmental milestones -
It refers to the physical skills , qualities or behaviors that are observed during the growing years of an infant , is referred to as development milestones .
Developmental milestones is also known as specific normative
There are range for every milestone of the stages of developments , like , crawling , walking , speaking etc .
There is some variable age group , where the child leans various activities .
Hence , from the given statement of the question ,
The correct option is D. developmental milestones .
Answer:
The Mandate of Heaven was created under the Zhou Dynasty. According to the Mandate of Heaven, China could only have one ruler at a time. The one ruler was considered to be the 'son of Heaven' and he was made the ruler with approval of Gods.
If a rule was not fair in his duties, then it was considered that God might have taken back His approval. Also, conditions like famine and natural disasters were considered that the Gods were unhappy with the ruler.
I believe the answer is: <span>Complex stepfamily
</span><span>Complex stepfamily refers to a type family that is formed with at least one parent who has a child that are not genetically related to the other parent.
This type of family become much more common in western nations as the number of couples who were divorced and remarry increases.</span>
Buddhism is a religious, philosophical and spiritual doctrine and has as its precept the reincarnation of the human being in order to bind us to the sufferings of the material world.
The name Zen is the name attributed to a Japanese philosophy (Ch'na) that had its origin in China around the 7th century and was then taken to the land of the rising sun. There is an association of Zen Buddhism with the Buddhist strand known as Mahayana. The basis of this strand is in the so-called zazen that would be in free translation "meditate seated".
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
