1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bingel [31]
3 years ago
14

Understanding the Case

History
1 answer:
S_A_V [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

You might be interested in
What can be done about prejudice and hate so that history never again sees something as horrible as the Holocaust?
Marina CMI [18]
Keep teaching these things in history class so that it can be remembered, and have a government similar to the United States
7 0
2 years ago
Who eventually overthrew the Roman empire?
leonid [27]

Answer:

no one

Explanation:

after alexander the greats death they fell

7 0
2 years ago
Some famous female roles in the history of opera have only been possible because 19th-century composers started giving important
Inessa05 [86]

Some famous female roles in the history of opera have only been possible because 19th-century composers started giving important roles to mezzo-sopranos.

By the Baroque period (1600-1750), opera had taken Europe by storm, a spectacular and expensive affair filled with ornate arias and elaborate sets with moving parts. One of the greatest composers of Italian baroque opera was George Friedrich Handel (1685-1759), a German who spent most of his life in London.

This period also saw the emergence of castrati, male singers who were castrated as boys to maintain their soprano voices. Those who survived to come out on top were the singing stars of the 17th and 18th centuries. Today these roles are sung by countertenors or women.

learn more about mezzo-soprano here: brainly.com/question/2948100

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Explain how the photograph of starving in Russian children, 1921 as a result of War Communism would be useful to a historian res
gladu [14]

Answer:

what's the picture? if you put it on, I'll know what to say

8 0
2 years ago
Explain the impact of Franklin D. Roosevelt on the presidency.
kow [346]
Promises a New Deal
-relief for needy
-economic recovery
-financial reform
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An unintended effect of the fifteenth amendment that protected black suffrage was that
    12·1 answer
  • B According to Steven Hugh Lee, what was one effect of the Korean War on American society?
    9·1 answer
  • What documents were written to persuade people to adopt the new constitution?
    7·1 answer
  • List the reasons President Truman use for deciding to drop atomic bombs on Japan
    8·1 answer
  • Followers of religious fundamentalism may become extremists when they interpret religious works A. Literally, regardless of time
    14·2 answers
  • What are the British Soldiers fighting for
    14·1 answer
  • To what family does the English language belong?
    5·1 answer
  • Using NSC-68, can you argue that Americans were worried that communists would "subvert" (to ruin or corrupt from within) America
    14·1 answer
  • Is there any noticeable bias in the u.s. Civil War​
    7·1 answer
  • 5. Which group of people did Europeans used for slave labor after many native people died?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!