1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bingel [31]
3 years ago
14

Understanding the Case

History
1 answer:
S_A_V [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

You might be interested in
Why did Mecca's leaders try to prevent the spread of Muhammad's message
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

Mecca leaders were worried about losing their political and economic power. The expansion of Islam, the new religion preached by Muhammad, contradicted traditional beliefs and practices of the Arab tribes. Its condemnation of idolatry and its monotheistic character was particularly troubling for them. The Quraysh tribe heads  in Mecca controlled the Kaaba - a key religious place still important in Islam -, and their political and religious power rested upon managing access to polytheistic shrines. So, Muhammad´s doctrine of one God - Allah - questioned their legitimacy and sociopolitical position.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How can a movie be both a primary and secondary source?
Paul [167]
If the movie is perhaps a documentary, then it is telling you factual information of actual events (includes pictures or pictures of actual documents or events); this makes it a primary source.
If the movie is based off of real events, has factual information, but also has added information to create a well-rounded plot, this makes it a secondary source.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following were primary occupations in the New England
GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

B, since it was a cash crop.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
How did the Versailles Treaty and the
andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

A result of the treaty of Versaille was for Germany to pay a bunch of money to the allied nations. This combined with the great depression put Germany's economy into the pooper. Obviously people demanded a change due to all of this and so hitler was able to rise to power

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What was a benefit of the Silk Road for countries the route crossed
Mkey [24]

The Silk Road was a network of trade routes that was extremely popular during Antiquity, all the way to the 18th century. This network connected faraway regions such as East and South Asia, Persia, the Arabian Peninsula and Southern Europe.

One of the benefits of the Silk Road for the countries the route crossed is that it allowed people in these regions to trade goods, providing a source of money as well as access to goods that were not normally available in their region. Another benefit was the fact that the road allowed for cultural exchange among these regions.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Business ownership in country x
    12·2 answers
  • Which type of human society has existed only since about the year 1750?
    8·1 answer
  • a city is political unit that operates similarly to an independent kingdom, although it shares culture with other areas? true or
    15·1 answer
  • What language was spoken in India
    5·2 answers
  • This is a period of greatly increased birth rate that occurred in the us after the end of wwii.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Louisiana Purchase?
    10·1 answer
  • Who built the white house?
    14·2 answers
  • Who was Adolf Hitler and why was he significant in World History?
    9·2 answers
  • explain why ancient Greece or more specifically ancient Athens made so many new development in different fields​
    13·1 answer
  • The age of unrest came after the Industrial Revolution.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!