The elements are:
<span>Climate, includes things such as temperature and humidity
water, includes liquid substance that exist on both upper and lower ground
landforms, which affects the formation of mountain and hills
soil, which became a medium for plants to grow
energy and mineral resources, where plants could get their nutrients
vegetation, includes all type of plants on the earth
wildlife, includes all type of animals on the earth</span>
"<span>c. strong character; military experience with the British army during the French and Indian War" is the best option, since his reputation in this war was great and people trusted him. </span>
The correct answer is D, as the Soviet Union exerted strict control over its media, while the United States didn't.
Censorship in the Soviet Union was a persuasive phenomenon of state ideological pressure that was valid throughout the history of that country (1922-1991), although with certain ups and downs. There were two periods of relaxation: the first, after the death of the dictator Joseph Stalin in 1953, and the second during the politics of glasnost ("transparency") launched by Mikhail Gorbachev in 1986.
Absolutely all the press media within the Soviet Union were strictly controlled by the State, whether it was radio, television, books, magazines and newspapers. This was achieved through the exclusive state ownership of all facilities dedicated to production, so that its members must necessarily be employees of the State. This also extended to the fine arts, including theater, opera and ballet. Music concerts and art exhibitions could only be held in controlled places previously authorized by the State.
Answer:
President Andrew Johnson declined to enact the verdict by the supreme court.
Explanation:
The President, Andrew Johnson responded to the decision by the supreme court by declining to enact their decisions. He rather enforced further laws that were against the Cherokees and they were gradually forced out of the land.
(Take this response with a grain of salt.)
I personally think that neither should determine that. Both questions are unable to determine whether the religion is true; so why would it be used to determine whether or not people have the right to follow it. However, putting that aside, I think the best answer would be how good their followers are. It doesn't determine whether the religion is true or not but it rids us of the toxic religions that spread negative messages. Considering how much racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism is in most religions it'd be interesting to see most religions cease.
Including commonly followed religions like Catholicism.
