Answer:
B). Comparative negligence.
Explanation:
'Comparative Negligence' is demonstrated as the legal doctrine in which an individual's compensation for an accident or injury is commensurable or proportionate to his/her percentage or degree of responsibility/liability.
in the given example, Susan would most probably employ 'comparative intelligence' to defend herself as damage caused by the dog to shoes and other valuable items was not only due to owner's negligence(but the neighbors/plaintiff too). <u>Thus, this would help Susan to proportionately reduce the amount of the recovery received by the plaintiffs as they too were contributory to the negligence that resulted in damage. </u>Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Explanation: 1)Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Fantasy and supernatural
2) William Wordsworth - Healing power of nature
3) William Blake - Mysticism and spirituality
4) Thomas Gray - Aspirations and potential of all human beings
The shootings and massacres are simply outrageous. The mass murder associated with these mass shooting are all happening for a reason, yet no reason it strong enough for the outcomes of these murders, and pain caused to people. We're all human and we live on thus small planet, so we all have to stick together, and seeing that's somebody is defying that is terrible. The United States is a place where all should be free, and should not have to cower behind the fear of being shot getting milk for your children. The mass shootings are terrible, and effect our nation terrible.
In the kitchen. When you say at you usually say that when your right outside of that area. When you say in that means your physically inside that location.