Answer:
a system which prevents one branch of government from asserting too much power over another
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>President Lincoln freed slaves, and he was apart of the Republican party. Slaves were freed during the civil war and the North/Union was the side that wanted to free them.</u>
Explanation: "That day—January 1, 1863—President Lincoln formally issued the Emancipation Proclamation, calling on the Union army to liberate all enslaved people in states still in rebellion as “an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon military necessity.” These three million enslaved people were declared to be “then, thenceforward, and forever free.” The proclamation exempted the border states that remained in the Union and all or parts of three Confederate states controlled by the Union army." "The Emancipation Proclamation transformed the Civil War from a war against secession into a war for “a new birth of freedom,” as Lincoln stated in his Gettysburg Address in 1863." The reality is that the North's opposition to slavery was based on political and anti-south sentiment, economic factors, racism, and the creation of a new American ideology. While the South was dependent on slavery and wanted to keep enslaved people. Hope this helps.
Answer:
<em>B. i and ii only.</em>
Explanation:
The Branches of Civil Law are: Contract Law, Tort Law, Property Law and Family Law.
However, in the case Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants CV-93-02419, 1995 (N.M. Dist., Aug. 18, 1994) a breach of implied warranty made the headlines of this civil case.
Civil law cases have a plaintiff, that is the ‘party’ who is filling the sue and the defendant, the one who is being sued.
In a civil case the victim requires by legal action that an unfilled duty be repaired or compensate by the defendant. But in criminal case the objective is to charge the defendant with a felony or misdemeanor offense against a person, the society or the state.
During the 1880s, following completion of the 105-mile Suez Canal, French entrepreneur Ferdinand DeLesseps poured billions of francs and 25,000 lives into an unsuccessful attempt to build a sea-level canal through Panama. The French effort was thwarted by disease, unreliable machinery, and almost a billion cubic yards of rock that stood in the way.
In 1879, Ferdinand Marie de Lesseps, the builder of the Suez Canal proposed a sea level canal through Panama. With the success he had with the construction of the Suez Canal in Egypt just ten years earlier, de Lesseps was confident he would complete the water circle around the world. Time and mileage would be dramatically reduced when traveling from the Atlantic to the Pacific ocean or vice versa. For example, it would save a total of 18,000 miles on a trip from New York to San Francisco.
Although de Lesseps was not an engineer, he was appointed chairman for the construction of the Panama Canal. Upon taking charge, he organized an International Congress to discuss several schemes for constructing a ship canal. De Lesseps opted for a sea-level canal based on the construction of the Suez Canal. He believed that if a sea-level canal worked when constructing the Suez Canal, it must work for the Panama Canal.
Answer:
advocated the use of alcohol
Explanation:
I'm not 100
