Answer:
A)5 is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
this is the answer
Answer:
10x²−9x
Step-by-step explanation:
10x²−10x−6+x+6
=10x²−10x−6+x+6
Combine Like Terms:
=10x²−10x−6+x+6
=(10x²)+(−10x+x)+(−6+6)
=10x²−9x
Hope this helps!
Answer:
$386.75
Step-by-step explanation:
First we must find the price of the camera after the man sold it, with the 10% loss.
To do this we find 10% of 414, which is 41.4 . Meaning the camera was originally bought from the dealer for $455.40, as we have to add the 10% back onto the price.
Now we find 15% of 455 and subtract it, with 15% being 68.25, the original cost was $386.75. My guy was seriously ripped off :(.
<h2>Orignal price: $386.75</h2>
The expression (-4x + 9)^2 cannot be equal to (-4x)^2 + 9^2 because it is actually equal to the product of two factors (3 + 2sqrt x) (3- 2 sqrt x). One cannot use obviously distributive property. Hence the answer to this problem should be C. as she did not understand both perfect square trinomial and did not determine the product
Answer:
3 people attended the banquet
Step-by-step explanation:
The function is given as:
b = 75 + 15n where
b represents the total = 122
n represents the number of people attending = ??
If the total cost of the banquet is 122, how many people attended the banquet?
Hence,
122 = 75 + 15n
122 - 75 = 15n
47 = 15n
Divide both sides by 15
n = 47/15
n = 3.1333333333
Approximately to the nearest whole number = 3
Therefore, 3 people attended the banquet.
