Diez was almost dead due to dehydration. His hopefulness and positive attitude to fight challenges helped him survive the odds.
Explanation:
The question is incomplete.
It is in reference to "Delfino II: Diez in the Desert".
Diez was crossing the border when they were in the desert at the North of Mexico with a group of immigrants. Diez along with other immigrants had suffered from bitter conditions like heat and severe dehydration. A woman in the group couldn't survive and Diez was almost dead due to dehydration. However, his hopefulness and positive attitude to fight the odds helped him to work on his goals and he survived the adversities. He encouraged the other members of the group not to give up and not get caught so that they reach their destination safely.
Answer:
... umm ok friend me and i will help also mark me brainliest this might take a while i have no idea what its asking but i think i can do it look down
vvvvv
Some characteristics of biblical speak will be speaking in an "old way" (using the words thou, thy,) other characteristics should be speaking very "preachy" (speaking in ways that you would use if you are speaking to an audience and persuading them to believe something.(in this case it getting you to believe in god.)) Perhaps the most obvious characteristic of the bible is its story-telling manner (most, if not, all of the text in the bible are all stories.) And its use of verses. (the text is neatly organized by using verses as sort of a smaller version of "chapters")
The response provided considers the appeal to logic, to character, and to emotion in the analysis, as expressed in options A, B, and C and explained below.
<h3>What is a rhetorical appeal?</h3>
A rhetorical appeal is a strategy used in order to convince one's audience of something. There are three possible appeals we can use to persuade our audience:
- Appeal to logic or logos.
- Appeal to character/credibility or ethos.
- Appeal to emotion or pathos.
The sample response provided in the instructions takes all the appeals into consideration when analyzing John Muir's statement. Let's break it down here:
- He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. - Appeal to logic.
- He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. - Appeal to character.
- Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout. - Appeal to emotion.
Therefore, we can select options A, B, and C as the correct answers for this question.
Learn more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Miller simply wanted to convey the message of fear over reason, express himself in a new language of old English, to warn of mass hysteria, and most importantly compare his life in the 1950's to the irrational trial in 1692
Answer: in a graduation speech, I would aspect more passion and more caring vibe to it. More professional.
Explanation: