Answer:
positive correlation
Explanation:
Neural processing speed determine the time that a person need in order to do a certain level of mental tasks. When solving a complicated problems, sometimes we need to pass through several different mental process before eventually come up with the solution. People with higher neural processing speed will finished the mental processes a lot faster and can come up with multiple solutions with the same time frame as people with slow neural processing speed.
Answer:
Exercising its check on the power of the legislations.
Explanation:
The supreme court belonged to the judicial branch of the government. As a form of check and balances, the judicial branch has the power to check the legislative branch by conducting a judicial review.
In a judicial review, the supreme court will evaluate the laws proposed by the congress and see if any part of the law proposal violates the United States constitution. If there's a part that violate it, the supreme court can deemed the proposed law as "unconstitutional" and the law cannot be passed by the Congress.
Answer:
No, because the delivery van striking the trooper was the actual cause of his injuries.
Explanation:
The state trooper will not prevail against the tractor trailer driver. This is because tractor trailer was not the actual cause for the injuries of the trooper. It was the deliver van which skid on the icy road and hit the trooper and which made him injured.
It was when the trooper went to respond to the accident of the tractor trailer that the delivery van approached the icy bridge and strike the trooper.
Thus the answer is No.
Answer:
Malicious prosecution
Explanation:
Malicious prosecution -
It refers to the situation , where one of the party files some malicious case over the other party , is referred to as the malicious prosecution .
There could be civil as well as criminal charges .
The example of malicious prosecution is mental torture , emotional distress , defamation etc.
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is malicious prosecution .
A peer revision shouldn't be just written as a quick bullet point list. Peer revisions should be in the complete format, should be in sentences with all the necessary things in it. Well, if needed then you should construct it including your bullet points.
