Absolutely, especially if the harm was intentional (on purpose). If you harm someone, you have to think about and live with that incident for the rest of your life. Ill will and feelings eat away at a person. You start to lose sleep; your health declines in many ways; overall, you just feel terrible. This is all multiplied even more when you intentional harm someone. Often times, you relive the incident over and over again. The harm being done to you, now, can be far worse than when you placed harm on someone else.
The concept of synchronisation in the text aids our understanding of human/animal relationships and bonding. This supports de Waal's claim because it demonstrates our interconnectedness.
<h3>What is de Waals claim about how humans are connected?</h3>
- According to de Waal, the ability of homo sapiens to communicate with one another led to the development of empathy. He uses instances of how people and other primates mimic other behaviours, such as yawning or laughing when others do the same, to bolster his claim.
- Because of their similar behaviors, the laughing humans mentioned in the first paragraph are related to the playful chimps. Instead of referring to a specific imitation act, the term "herd instinct" describes a general tendency to behave in accordance with others.
- Readers should be familiar with Robinson Crusoe's tale of survival on an island, which de Waal likens to the Western concept of individualism. He draws a striking contrast between his assertion that we are in fact deeply connected with the idea of Robinson Crusoe.
To learn more about Frans de Waal refer:
brainly.com/question/19756247
#SPJ1
<span>Dante's view of hell was reflected throughout his account where he claims to have seen all these things described in his work. On the balance of good and evil, both are matched, both for good and for evil. On the good, it is the justice that causes each individual to obtain his reward of his works and the bad thing is reflected in the evil of the man and its consequences. However, horror and terror focuses more on the story and that transmits meanings of evil.</span>
Answer:
C. To prove the correct interpretation of a piece of literature based on fact
I wish I could help but I’m just answering any questions to get points
