Answer:
No, he actually did what was in his best interest, not that of the client's.
Explanation:
Norms provide order in society. ... Human beings need norms to guide and direct their behavior, to provide order and predictability in social relationships and to make sense of and understanding of each other's actions. These are some of the reasons why most people, most of the time, conform to social norms.
Answer:
Implicit prejudice; explicit prejudice.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, both of this cases of prejudice involves negative attitudes against a certain individual, person, group, etc. In the first case, the implicit, the attitude is not openly talked, verbalized; it's unspoken. But, in the second case, the explicit prejudice involves the awareness of hatred or negative attitude of the individual. So, overall, in the first case the person is not completely aware of the thoughts, attitude or feelings, but on the second case it is completely.
The answer to your question is that the court would use the Exclusionary Rule.
Hope this helped...sorry if it was wrong.
