Answer:
Beacuse Of there pro anti-treaty of Versailles view most germans Dispised it and wanted an end to it quickly
point 2 the racialy superior ideal that all germans are above and it made them feel invincible and better then the whole of europe
point 3
Joseph Goebbels Propganda he produced alot of propganda and they knew the mind of the young the mind of the future thos lead to many children being turned in Pro war political Nazi Sympathizers
Explanation:
Pro war
Anti Treaty of Versailles
Racial Superiority
Propganda
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>A. The constitution already limited Powers of government, so a list of rights was not needed. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The idea behind having a Constitution is that it limits the powers of the government and sets certain law and rules that are to be followed while governing. Hence when there were debates for the "ratification" of the Constitution, the Federalists concluded that the Constitution didn’t require any list of rights, as the Constitution itself limits the powers of the government. Moreover, Bill of Rights was unnecessary as the Constitution was drafted with a strong concept of "Separation of Powers", and the Check and Balance system. Under this the government has been divided into three categories and these three categories check and limit the powers of each other.
Simply put, by coercion.
There was a very simple process that followed:
(1) the Red Army invades the countries, on the pretext of "liberating" them - this gives a plausible veneer to a treacherous end;
(2) whilst occupying, Soviet commissars would prop up the local communist party (typically, enjoying only minimal support from the country's population, unless also nationalist) - this is so as to have a puppet regime-in-waiting;
(3) under Soviet occupation, typically some sort of a "referendum" or "plebiscite" will be held, at which SUDDENLY the voters will "decide" to abolish the previous constitution and to enact one that practically gives sole powers to the local communists - this is to give the effective coup d'etat a veneer of legitimacy;
(4) once installed in power, the communist party will effectively take over the machinery of state by staffing all key posts with its members;
(5) through the use of secret police and kangaroo courts, opposition, incl. those of the original governing class who did not have the good sense to escape, will be physically eliminated, sentenced to long prison terms, exiled, otherwise incarcerated;
(6) a the takeover of the state is usually followed by a takeover, through nationalisation or outright confiscation, of the economy, giving the regime financial muscle;
<span>(7) the established position will be upheld by the same means it was acquired and with unparalleled degree of ruthlessness, with the country taken over being treated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kremlin Holdings.</span>
Answer:
Why did france want to control the land at the mouth of the mississippi river?
Explanation:
Answer:
The country is adopting a democracy against many warring parties.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best describes the problems that the Democratic Republic of the Congo has faced since Seko's toppling in 1997.
Following this political development, the DRC became a republic, transitioning from a civil war to a semi-presidential system. The nation drafted a Constitution in 2005, and held elections in 2006. However, the transition has not been smooth. Many political, cultural and religious groups oppose the transition. Many disagree with the ideas of democracy, while others want to take power for themselves. This has led to a difficult democratization process in the nation.
