Answer:
1.Buck saves Thornton's life
2.Buck wins $1,600 for Thornton.
3.Thornton looks for a lost mine.
4.The men find gold.
5.Buck spends time alone in the forest.
Answer:
Not all of the writer’s evidence is relevant to her argument, though. In defending the movie version of the book, she cites reviewer Peter Rainer:
Reviewers have offered equally high praise for the movie. Film critic Peter Rainer notes in his online movie review for the ?Christian Science Monitor,? “the great conundrum of the Holocaust is that it was perpetrated by human beings, not monsters. Few movies have rendered this puzzle so powerfully.” (Rainer, November 8, 2008) It is interesting to note that Rainer has also reviewed Richard Linklater’s ? Boyhood.? ?Boyhood ? is another child-centered movie. (Rainer, July 11, 2014)
Rainer’s comments about the strength of the movie are relevant. But the fact that Rainer has reviewed other child-centered movies adds nothing to the claim the writer is trying to support.
No writer is entirely wrong or entirely right. By applying critical analysis to the full text of a persuasive selection, readers can evaluate the persuasiveness of the arguments. Reading critically is essential for readers who want to navigate their way through published opinions, editorials, blog posts, theater and movie reviews, or any other persuasive texts. First, identify the writer’s claim. Second, examine the supporting evidence for relevance and reliability. Finally, decide whether or not the writer has argued for his or her claim persuasively
Answer:
Maybe u could say Lisa has decided to buy flowers for her friend's birthday. she recalled that her friend once told her about a flower shop that she likes alot. she decided to go to her friend's favourite shop. in order to get there, she rode a train. while buying, she fell down. a stranger helped her up. Lisa continue her journey
one day, during a lesson, the teacher announce that there will be a new student joining them and coincidentally, it was that stranger... and then they become friends :)
Answer:
The millipede <u>moves</u> on fewer then a hundred legs.
Because this sentence is not a future-tense statement, the answer is "moves"
