HELP!!! which of these actions would be an unconstitutional violation of rights

2 answers:

8 0

The correct answer is number 4. Authorities refuse to give a demonstration permit to a group that wants to hold a rally promoting racists beliefs.

<em>The action that would be a constitutional violation of rights is if authorities refuse to give a demonstration permit to a group that wants to hold a rally promoting racists beliefs. </em>

The United States Constitution grants the right of free speech and public demonstration if it's in a peaceful way Although the motive can be questionable, in the case of this question the authority needs to authorize the racist rally because that group has the Constitutional right to express themselves. The only condition is to do it in order, in a peaceful way.

coldgirl [10]3 years ago

7 0

I'm pretty sure it'd be 1 and 4

You might be interested in

Explain how the French and Indian War changed the borders of the Georgia Colony.

pantera1 [17]

The French and Indian War

Georgia took on a new shape as a result of that treaty, with its western boundary becoming the Mississippi River rather than the Pacific Ocean. ... West Florida, with Pensacola as its capital, extended west to the Mississippi River.

7 0

2 years ago

During the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King stressed the involvement of many groups and reached out to people of all co

Lorico [155]

Answer:

The strengths of excluding other groups gave black people a stronger voice for what they wanted and not what other groups think they wanted. Black people were able to express themselves more comfortably this way. While when other groups were included, they were able to share their opinions and feel included, especially if they supported what black people were doing.

The weaknesses of excluding other groups could have made other minorities (Asian, Native American, etc.) feel as if they were not as worthy of being heard. White people may have felt a certain way about not being able to express and spread their sympathy with the black folk.

Involving everyone was an effective tactic. Even if some people were not black, it let them express their disapproval of segregation and it showed the nation that not all white people were racist and believed the nation should be split.

5 0

3 years ago

Who said:

djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi, hi,

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

2. Islam accepts both the Jewish Torah and the Christian Bible, but

OLEGan [10]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Muslims believe that God had previously revealed Himself to the earlier prophets of the Jews and Christians, such as Abraham, Moses, and Jesus. Muslims therefore accept the teachings of both the Jewish Torah and the Christian Gospels.

5 0

1 year ago

Who was Lee Harvey Oswald A)The man who assassinated Kennedy B)the man who shot Kennedy's assassisn C) the man who tried to stop

Mars2501 [29]

The correct answer is A. The man who assassinated Kennedy.

Explanation

John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) was the president of the United States from 1961 to 1963 when he was killed in the city of Dallas in the state of Texas by Lee Harvey Oswald, who days later would also be killed by Jack Ruby in a confusing episode when he was being taken to an investigation before a judge. The reasons for Lee Harvey Oswald to assassinate the president are uncertain, but when he was killed a few days after the President's assassination there was no clarity about the fact beyond the insistent self-declaration as innocent of Harvey Oswald. So, the correct answer is A. The man who assassinated Kennedy.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers