Answer:
Yr. amount Interest payment balance
1. 319,500 22365. (77923). 263,942
2. 263,942.18,476. (77,923). 204,495
3. 204,495 14315. (77923). 140,887
4. 140,887. 9862 (77923). 72,826
5. 72826. 5098. (77,923). 1
Explanation:
The interest charge is on the total amount due at the end of the year which is assumed to have been made available to the debtor, the annual payment is deducted from the addition of interest and principal due and the balance due is brought forward to be defray in subsequent years. The balance is expected to show zero but the balance of one shown is a roundup error.
Answer: Perfect Competition
Explanation:
This is a situation prevailing in a market in which buyers and sellers are so numerous and well informed that all elements of monopoly are absent.
Answer: Liability of $300,000
Explanation:
In the question above, what we have is a deferred tax liability, which could be explained as the amount accrued in taxes at a present time but payable in the future. The tax rate will not be based in the present tax rate. Thus is why we will not be using the 30% tax tate of 2018 in calculating the tax amount.
Tax rate = 40%
Exceeded tax basis = $750,000
0.4 × 750,000 = $300,000
Therefore, Johns-Hopper should report the deferred tax effect of this difference in its December 31, 2018, balance sheet as Liability of $300,000
Answer: a. percentage change analysis.
B. Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc.’s ability to meet its debt obligations has improved since its debt-to-equity ratio decreased from 0.60 to 0.38.
D. A decline in the inventory turnover ratio could likely be explained by operational difficulties that the company faced, which led to duplicate orders placed to vendors
Explanation:
1. The analysis which has to do with the calculation of the growth rates of all items from balance sheet and the income statement which is relative to a base year is referred to as the percentage change analysis.
2. The statements that can be included in the analysis report from the question include:
• Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc.’s ability to meet its debt obligations has improved since its debt-to-equity ratio decreased from 0.60 to 0.38
• A decline in the inventory turnover ratio could likely be explained by operational difficulties that the company faced, which led to duplicate orders placed to vendors.
