During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Spaniards tried to explain the exercise of Aztec painting via the lens of the EU art concept. Their rhetoric and iconography, which constructed a distorted view of painting in Aztec Mexico, potentially tell us less about that practice than it does about the anxieties and expectancies of individuals who produced those texts and photographs. As students have recommended, the art of portrayal might also have furnished a domain for touch and compatibility among Aztecs and Spaniards.
Whilst Aztec emperor, Montezuma had a well-known disagreement with Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés. He initially welcomed Cortés but, while unable to shop for him off, laid a entice in Tenochtitlán. Cortés, but, took Montezuma prisoner, hoping to prevent an Aztec attack.
When Moctezuma went to fulfill them at Huitzillan, he bestowed gifts on Cortes he gave him flora, put necklaces on him hung garlands around him, and put wreaths on his head. Then he laid out before him, the golden necklaces, all of his items for the Spaniards.
Learn more about Moctezuma and Cortes here:-brainly.com/question/6711918
#SPJ9
The second continental congress was mainly about managing the war effort and driving the nation towards independence. so its the last one and maybe the second to last one.
Battle of Natural Bridge
Explanation:
the battle prevented the union from capturing the Florida couple and made Tallahassee the only Confederate Capital east of the Mississippi River not to be captured by the Union forces during the war. Near midday the union troops of the 2nd and the 99th us colored infantry regiments attacked for several hours of woods. The Confederates had the advantage of the solid defensive position working and by the end of the battle more I hope this helped :)
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
Being in a valley results in air pollution being contained to an area.
Answer:
Generally, white power structures responded to the Civil Rights Movement based on their geographic location. Thus, most southerners spoke out against this movement, while most northerners supported the cause. This situation was even transversal to the Democratic and Republican parties, since for example Lyndon Johnson, Democratic President who approved the Civil Rights Act in 1964, supported the movement while Orval Faubus, Governor of Arkansas for the same party, did not do so in absolute.
In general, the governors and mayors of the south of the country did everything possible to prevent the advancement and achievements of this movement, through imprisonment (such as in Birmingham, where Martin Luther King was imprisoned), police repression and various government restrictions.
In contrast, northern politicians and those in Washington generally had a more open and responsive stance, supporting the movement and believing in equal opportunities.
