1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
son4ous [18]
3 years ago
6

write one similarity and different between the goals of the abolitionist movement and the goals of the womens rights movement?

History
2 answers:
lidiya [134]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

fbjebfeifadkj.nhcbixjkbfsdfa wda

Explanation:

kotegsom [21]3 years ago
5 0

The Women's rights movement was a movement for gender equality. At the time women were not allowed to vote. The Abolitionist movement was to end slavery completely and totally.

So a similarity could be that those involved in both were fighting for equality weather it was gender or racial.

A difference could be that the abolitionists were fighting to put an end to slavery and free those who were slaves at the time but, the also wanted to move towards ending racial segregation. So,  abolitionists were not only fighting fo physical freedom but, social freedom as well. On the other hand, the suffragists involved in the Women's movement were fighting to get women the right to vote and therefore, social freedom.

In short, the abolitionist were fighting to get physical and social freedom for slaves while suffragists, fought to get women the right to vote and their social freedom.

(Social Freedom- What I mean by Social freedom is, having the freedom to be a part of society without restrictions based on you race, gender, etc.)

Hope This Helps!!  

You might be interested in
Might the Trojans have seen anything sinister if they had looked more closely at the wooden horse?
jek_recluse [69]
Yes, they would have, because in the wooden horse was a contingent of Greek soldiers waiting to help their follow comrades outside the city get into the city of Troy to destroy it.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is meant by a proxy war?
777dan777 [17]

Answer: a proxy war is started by a major power, but they do not themselves become involved

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Dlaczego Hitler w 1938 r. przystąpił do ataków na sąsiednie państwa? Jakie okoliczności skłoniły go do tego?
olga nikolaevna [1]

1. Answer:

  • W ramach obrony Hitler planował zaatakować sąsiednie kraje. Mając około 1,5 miliona żołnierzy, postanowił zacząć od pierwszego ataku na Polskę. Granica około 1750 mil była kontrolowana przez armię niemiecką.

  • Zbombardowali wiele lotnisk w Polsce i uniemożliwili innemu krajowi ingerowanie w ich praktyki wojenne. Podpisali pakt z ZSRR. W którym oba kraje potajemnie postanowiły podzielić Polskę na dwie części.

  • Niemcy wygrały wojnę i zajęły Polskę. Później postanowili zaatakować Danię, Norwegię, Belgię, Francję, Grecję,

  • W wyniku tego spustoszenia Wielka Brytania i Francja połączyły ręce, aby walczyć z Niemcami i powstrzymać Hitlera.

2. Answer:

Hilter chciał etnicznie oczyścić Europę Wschodnią. Chciał, aby kraje te zostały skolonizowane przez Niemców. Nie ujawnił tego jednak otwarcie, dlatego stosując różne taktyki zainicjował wojnę z Polską. Miał agresywną politykę zagraniczną. Wkrótce po wygranej z Polską rozpoczął kampanię przeciwko Żydom i przedstawił światu straszne dni holokaustu.

<u>Kiedy League of Nation nie powstrzymała go przed pójściem dalej na wojnę, ówcześni politycy wpadli na nowy pomysł ułaskawienia Hitlera. Pozornie dałoby to Hitlerowi to, czego chce, i przestałby dalej wzmacniać wojnę.</u>

3 0
3 years ago
The reason for so many countries being involved in World War I is a
umka2103 [35]

Answer: True

Explanation:

So many countries were allied or opposed to one another that no one expected that there would be a war, especially the one with the horrific consequences of world war one.

8 0
2 years ago
What happened to Alexander’s empire after his death? Who took what?
vladimir2022 [97]
<span>The correct answer is that after the death of Alexander The Great, The current Macedonian generals during his time were arguing about, who will take over Alexander's great empire, after the argument, three distinct leaders were entitled, Antigonnus, Ptolemy, and Selecus. One was the ruled of the Macedonian Greek city-states, the other won over the tile of pharaoh on Egypt and lastly, the other won over control on the Persian Empire.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The wave of revolutions across Europe in 1848 is known as the Springtime of Peoples. True or False
    13·2 answers
  • How did the expansion of European empires such as the Dutch, British, and Portuguese change global interactions?
    7·1 answer
  • From your reading, why do you think President president roosevelt believed america needed to expand its realm of influence?
    11·1 answer
  • What environmental problems does the world face today
    13·1 answer
  • Which group started off with militia from the Boston area?
    8·2 answers
  • Three major events in William Bradfords life
    10·1 answer
  • Helpppppppppppppppppp​
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of native Americans in the late 1700s and early 1800s​
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the Inuit mostly eat meat?
    7·2 answers
  • Who invented the incandescent light bulb?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!