Answer:
- Compare sources to analyze their content for historical bias.
- Approach current interpretations of past events as historical fiction.
Explanation:
Though you can distinguished hindsight bias everywhere in human history, the event was first defined and analyzed as such. We might further look at all the positions and secondary aspects and understand that given these variables, it was apparent what was going to follow. Early studies asked individuals annual-classification trivia puzzles or required them to anticipate federal elections; they asked members to evoke their foresight. You might step away from the movie believing that you knew it all along, but the truth is that you plausibly didn't. When a drama approaches its end, and we learn who the killer was, we may look behind on our concept of the movie and misremember our primary impressions of the guilty character.
With money and ships and guns and anger and power and stuff
I can’t see that choices but I can say this indicates that only about half of sub-Saharan Africa’s 128 million school-aged children currently attending school are likely to acquire the basic skills needed for them to live healthy and productive lives.
The option that best describes the NAACP’s strategy for ending segregation in public schools would be "<span>The NAACP challenged segregation by filing lawsuits in several states," since it worked largely through legal and non-violent means. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
President grant was trying to save his face from the scandals that was uproaring about him thinking if he gets to the barrel his scandal will end. President grant was not corrupt but he was surrounded by corrupt individual and he was attempting to run away from his problems.
If he focus on the scandal he would not be able to focus on the reconstruction effort. This eventually affect his governance has he not trusted by his own people again.
