Answer:1. adversarial system of justice
2. Pretrial, trial and post trial
3. What must be determined during the trial
4. Defendant, service of process
5. False
6.counterclaim
7.
Explanation:
1. This is a system of justicee whereby advocates are allowed to represent their clients and a jury eventually gives a judgement as to whether the the client is guilty or innocent. It is usually practised in common law countries.
2.Pretrial being the 1st phase in this phase, the defendant determines how best to to represent himself as well as providing answers to the complaint laid against him
Trial stage is that stage where the fact and figures are being gathered by both paties and presented to the jury
Post trial stage. It is at this stage that the jury passes a judgement based on the evidences provided.
4. Anderson is the defendant because
he his the one who has committed an offence and has a case to prove.
5. Anderson cannot claim that LI is lying about the accident because their would be evidences against him. He can only give reasons why he
ran into li's car.
6. Maxwell can Counterclaim because it was a collision. Maxwell can claim that it was actually Julian that collided with him because they were but in motion.
Answer:
I believe it is True. (im not positive but im pretty sure. Just read the explanation)
Explanation:
The idea of multiple personalities which is also associated with identity disassocation comes from something that happened to the person. Therefore the bodies identity can be altered by a particular historical moment.
President Clinton declared a state of emergency and took part in the organisation of NATO's air bombing, but he was very reluctant to commit ground troops to Yugoslavia. He did the last too, however, under the European pressure.
<span>Human rights are the essential rights and flexibilities that have a place with each individual on the planet, from birth until death. They apply paying little heed to where you are from, what you accept or how you carry on with your life. They can never be taken away, in spite of the fact that they can at times be limited – for instance if a man infringes upon the law, or in light of a legitimate concern for national security.</span>
Answer:
I think A but I could be wrong
