First we have to work out everything inside the parentheses (according to PEMDAS):
9 × 2 = 18
4 - 2 = 2
Now, we can rewrite the expression:
4 + 18 ÷ 2 + 1
According to PEMDAS, we should complete the division in the middle first:
18 ÷ 2 = 9
Now we can rewrite the expression again:
4 + 9 + 1
And now it's as simple as just adding the three numbers together:
4 + 9 + 1 = 14
Your final answer is 14. :)
Converting to spherical coordinates, we have
On the other hand, we can parameterize the boundary of
by
with
and
. Now, consider the surface element
So we have the surface integral - which the divergence theorem says the above triple integral is equal to -
as required.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
Put the value where the variable is and see if you get a true statement.
2(-4) -8 = -15
-8 -8 = -15 . . . . . . . false
-4 is <em>not a solution</em> to the equation
Answer:
search mo foogle noe kasi mali
Check the table attached.
The first coordinates of each pair represent the 1.roll, and the second coordinates the 2nd, roll.
All the possible outcomes are {(1, 1), (1, 2).... (6, 5), (6, 6)}, a total of 36, as can be seen in the table.
Each outcome has a chance of 1 out 36 total possible outcomes of occurring.
So the probability is 1/36=0.02778