Answer:
So maybe they had nothing to talk about before they got married and they thought that if they got married then they would have something to talk about or they were pregnant and if they were younger than 18 they decided to get married.
Explanation:
The report required by the above question, wants to assess its ability to deal with plagiarism and combat it in an educational institution. As this is something very personal, I cannot write the report for you, but I will show you how to write it.
First, it is important that you know that palgiarism is the act of presenting, as your creation, a text, or any other media, created by someone else. This is a criminal practice and should not be encouraged.
Knowing this, you should research ways to combat plagiarism in a school or other educational institution. Some ways are:
- Show students what plagiarism is.
- Show how this practice is criminal.
- Show how academic education is undermined by plagiarism.
- Teach students how quotes and paraphrases should be done and how research sources should be used.
After doing this research, you can choose some of these tactics to present them in your report, always showing the effects they propose and how this can be beneficial to combat plagiarism.
The report must be done as follows:
- Give an introduction to plagiarism and how harmful it is.
- Show how the educational institution has been affected by plagiarism.
- Show how tactics to combat plagiarism should be established.
- Show expected results through the use of these tactics.
You can find more information at the link below:
brainly.com/question/19872406?referrer=searchResults
I believe you are talking about the Sergei in the “What, of This
Goldfish, Would You Wish?” If that's so, then the theme about happiness presented here is that people hold onto different things for their happiness. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I would respond to an attorney who argues that the First Amendment protects the actions of paparazzi in any circumstance, without exception, in the following way.
People have the right to exert their own freedom to the degree they do not mess with my freedom of defending my privacy or they do not mess with the privacy of other people.
So this means paparazzi have the freedom to allow for the best shots of artists or public figures when these public figures are in a public sphere or scene: working, public appearances, red carpets, and so on
But there is a fine but notorious line that these paparazzi must never cross. And that is the private life of people. And that always must be respected, no matter what.
Private life is of no interest to the audiences.
