Can you please explain in comments?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
no turns on any solid lines
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
I think is A because something that you believe in means you will change behavior you will support that belief so much were it might get to a point were you argue with people if they don't believe on that belief.
LOL idk if is right I try