Hello. You forgot the answer options. The options are:
a. Jurisdiction over the Wizard internet.
b. Jurisdiction over the subject matter of the lawsuit.
c. Jurisdiction over the plaintiff only.
d. Both jurisdiction over the Wizard internet & jurisdiction over the subject matter of the lawsuit.
Answer:
d. Both jurisdiction over the Wizard internet & jurisdiction over the subject matter of the lawsuit.
Explanation:
It is necessary that the Montana court has all the information possible to understand the case and to judge it correctly without expressing errors or confusions. In this case, the court must have and interpret all jurisdiction over Wizard internet, understanding all the elements presented, as well as must have and interpret jurisdiction over the whole subject of the process.
Answer:
Check below for the answers and explanations
Explanation:
1) Standing is the process of examining the right of a plaintiff to take a lawsuit to the court of law.
Standing is important to ensure that the case brought to court is actually a dispute and not a contempt from an aggrieved party. It also ensures that the innocent is not unlawfully punished.
2) Sierra Club could have had a standing to file the lawsuit if it had an evidence or a likelihood of being injured or harmed
3) The Sierra club case led to the birth of a dissent that environmental objects should be regarded as persons in ecological matters.
4)The case did not have standing because it was filed by an organization and this conflicts with the Animal Welfare Act which stated that individuals and organizations do not have standing to file a lawsuit in a court.
5) Mr Jurnove, a worker of the Animal Legal Defence Fund was able to provide a substantial claim of the injuries he suffered when he saw the ill treatment the animals were subjected to by USDA.
Though other plaintiffs do not have standing, as far as one of them does, it will not be considered whether or not the others have standing. Therefore, the plaintiff had standing.
6) None of the plaintiffs that were acting on behalf of the dolphin met the requirement of "Injury in fact", a necessary requirement to have standing. None of them could give evidences of the injuries suffered as a result of the act by The New England Aquarium.
Answer:
He should shoot for the safety for everyone’s life.
Explanation:
Answer:
only party members b on edu 2020
Explanation:
