Hey there!
The answer would be Bush V. Gore
Bush V. Gore was a decision in the United States Supreme court that settles a recount dispute in Florida’s 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000.
Hope this helps!
I believe so if I remember correctly
Participant observation I think hope this helps :)
Answer:
any reason the supervisor or senior official deems appropriate
Explanation:
the probationary period generally does not require fair procedures to be following if being terminated.
If Pamela appeals the case in order to include the witness who saw Darin driving, it is possible that the appeals court will not take the witness's testimony into account.
<h3>What happens if Pamela appeals?</h3>
Appeals courts are not there to retry a case or to give the case a new trial. Their purpose is to check if there were errors in the way the lower court handled the case.
This means that they often do not take new witness testimony into account. What this means for Pamela is that even though she has a new witness, the appeals court might not consider the testimony of the witness because they were not used in the first court.
Find out more on the appeals process at brainly.com/question/1897528
#SPJ1
