The forms of Government in china differ from the forms of government in costa rica because Chinese political system is authoritarian while the one in Costa Rica is a democratic republic.
<h3>How did the forms of
Government in china differ from the
forms of government in costa rica?</h3>
Costa Rica can be described as a country that practice a democratic republic which has a very strong system of constitutional checks and balances.
Chinese political system on the other hand is authoritarian , which made it to be differnt.
It should be noted that Authoritarianism which is the form of government that is been adopted by the Chinese is been described as the rejection of political plurality.
It should be noted that this involves the use of strong central power , and this is to be able to preserve the political status quo in the system.
It involves the reductions as regards the rule of law as well as separation of powers and this is not inline with the democratic voting.
Learn more about Government at:
brainly.com/question/18464634
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. north to Siberia, south to Sicily and Italy, and west to France
Explanation:
In the battle of Stalingrad which began in the summer of 1942, the Germans launched an offensive against the Russians and had the Russians pinned but could not break beyond their defences.
Due to the harsh weather and diminishing strength and resources, the Germans began to weary and the Russians took a bold offensive counterattack. In November 19,the Russians took the offensive and launched strategic attacks.
The flanked the Germans through the north and south simultaneously and eventually got Germany to surrender.
Answer:
I agree
Explanation:
I agree because im not a trump supporter.
Animal cruelty wasnt the biggest of their concerns during the progressive movement
so the correct answer is animal cruelty
Answer:
On July 15, 1979, President Jimmy Carter addresses the nation via live television to discuss the nation’s energy crisis and accompanying recession.
Carter prefaced his talk about energy policy with an explanation of why he believed the American economy remained in crisis. He recounted a meeting he had hosted at the presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland, with leaders in the fields of business, labor, education, politics and religion. Although the energy crisis and recession were the main topics of conversation, Carter heard from the attendees that Americans were also suffering from a deeper moral and spiritual crisis. This lack of “moral and spiritual confidence,” he concluded, was at the core of America’s inability to hoist itself out of its economic troubles. He also admitted that part of the problem was his failure to provide strong leadership on many issues, particularly energy and oil consumption.
