1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bazaltina [42]
3 years ago
13

Reliability is how long an item or system will perform its function before it breaks. Good reliability will ____________________

__. Decrease logistics support requirements Increase life cycle sustainment costs Decrease system readiness Increase manpower waste
Business
1 answer:
Ilya [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Decrease logistics support requirements.

Explanation:

Decrease logistics support requirements is the correct answer because the increase in reliability decreases the requirement to correct the commodity or equipment. Therefore, the logistic support decreases which further decreases the manpower waste. Additionally, the good reliability shows that the product's quality is good and it will work efficiently for a longer time period. Thus, a good quality product requires less logistic support.

You might be interested in
A contract clause which specifies the amount of damages to be paid in the event of a breach is called:
Usimov [2.4K]

A contract clause which specifies the amount of damages to be paid in the event of a breach is called C. a liquidated damages clause.

A contract clause is a specific section that is added into a clause and addresses specific subject matters or topics. These clauses are normally added to make sure each section understands and performs their duties.

6 0
4 years ago
Consider the following game in which two firms decide how much of a homogeneous good to produce. The annual profit payoffs for e
inessss [21]

Answer:

Consider the following explanation

Explanation:

Context

Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.

In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.

1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.

Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.

Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.

Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.

5 0
3 years ago
Amous architect who said "there is no architecture without construction"
elixir [45]

Answer: Aris Konstantinidis

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The aggregate demand for good X is Q​ = 20 minus ​P, and the market price is P​ = $8. What is the maximum amount that consumers
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

so maximum amount that consumers are willing to pay for the quantity demanded at this​ price = $168

Explanation:

given data

Q​ = 20 - ​P

P​ = $8

to find out

maximum amount that consumers are willing to pay for the quantity demanded at this​ price

solution

we get here demand at current market price that is

Q = 20 - P

Q = 20 - 8

Q = 12

and Total expenditure incurred will be at at current market price will be

Total expenditure incurred  = Price × Quantity ..................1

Total expenditure incurred  = $8 × 12

Total expenditure incurred  = $96

and

we get price when Q = 0

Q = 20 - P  

P = 20

so now consumer surplus will be here as

consumer surplus = 0.5 × ( Price when(Q = 0) - Current market price) × Quantity ............................2

put her value we get

consumer surplus = 0.5 × ( 20 - 8 ) × 12

consumer surplus = $72

and

now we get maximum amount that is

maximum amount = Current expenditure + Consumer surplus  

maximum amount = $96 + $72

maximum amount = $168

so maximum amount that consumers are willing to pay for the quantity demanded at this​ price = $168

8 0
3 years ago
Mark, Cal and Aidan have decided to form a business where all owners will share in operating the business and in assuming liabil
Llana [10]

The partnership most likely formed is a general partnership.

<h3>What is a general partnership?</h3>

A general partnership is when two or more people come together to form a business. The people who come together to create the business are referred to as partners.

In a general partnership, all the partners are responsible for the running the company. All the partners have an unlimited liability.

To learn more about partnerships, please check: brainly.com/question/9909227

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Two products, QI and VH, emerge from a joint process. Product QI has been allocated $9,600 of the total joint costs of $12,000.
    12·1 answer
  • What to put for type of work authroization?
    7·1 answer
  • explain how companies engage in price competition in nonprice competition and give an example of each kind of competition
    9·1 answer
  • Abby and Bailey are partners who share income in the ratio of 2:1 and have capital balances of $60,000 and $30,000, respectively
    13·1 answer
  • An internal strength that has consistently been the differentiating factor for Charles Schwab is its focus on the customer. This
    6·1 answer
  • Question 6 (1 point)
    12·1 answer
  • *20 points and Brainliest for right answer ASAP**<br> In a SWOT analysis, what are strengths?
    6·2 answers
  • The board of commissioners of the City of Hartmoore adopted a General Fund budget for the year ending June 30, 2017, that includ
    6·1 answer
  • What type of industry would Tim Hortons and McDonalds be classified as?
    10·1 answer
  • discuss money supply and inappropriate government policies as causes of fluctuations in business cycles​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!