Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
Answer:
Which of the following is a common sign that a chemical change has occurred?
Step-by-step explanation:
rodrickkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Answer:
(5,1)
Step-by-step explanation:
if macs house if it’s 1/2 of the distance from Nate house to the park then half the distance of 10,2 is 5,1
You got this!!!! just don’t rush, if you really don’t know the answer, just chose letter C hahah :)
Try using PEMDAS,
Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
So just do the problem in that order.
