Answer:
Either would be good depending on context.
Explanation:
Ok, for this one I think that you could use either, depending on your context. if you are writing something from the perspective of when she was on the supreme court then you can use the first one. but if it is from the perspective of her legacy, or of an opinion she has right now about when she was a supreme court justice it might be best.
Hope this helps!
~B
There was a hare and tortoise who argued which among them is the fastest runner. So they decided to have a race to prove which one of them is the faster. The hare run as fast as he could. When he realized that he was far ahead of the tortoise he decided to take a nap. He was very confident that he was going to win the race. The hare did not realize that he fell asleep for a very long time. Because of his carelessness, the tortoise won the race.
Rainsford does not hold human life on the same level as animal life. For Rainsford hunting is a sport or a means to gain food, not a mere even to simply kill for the love of killing.
Zaroff's ideas counter this in that Zaroff has progressed to the point where killing humans, the most intelligent beings, has become a sport to him.
The bottom line is that the two men have different world views which influence their actions.
Hello, the answer to your question is Jim Gallien