Answer: The answer could be C because is the image of the rotation by 90 degrees clockwise. I hope its right
Answer:
The proof that πk(C1)=πk(C2) of course would just apply the similarity of polygons and the behavior of length and area for changes of scale. This argument does not assume a limit-based theory of length and area, because the theory of length and area for polygons in Euclidean geometry only requires dissections and rigid motions ("cut-and-paste equivalence" or equidecomposability). Any polygonal arc or region can be standardized to an interval or square by a finite number of (area and length preserving) cut-and-paste dissections. Numerical calculations involving the πk, such as ratios of particular lengths or areas, can be understood either as applying to equidecomposability classes of polygons, or the standardizations. In both interpretations, due to the similitude, the results will be the same for C1 and C2.
Answer:
When a graph has 2 x-intercepts, it will have positive discriminant & when a graph has NO x-intercepts, it will have negative discriminant.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a quadratic equation, the discriminant is the value of 
. This is "under the square root sign" when solving using quadratic formula.
Thus, there can be 3 possibilities:
1. Discriminant is 0 ( 2 equal real roots - meaning 1 touching point at the x-axis in the graph)
2. Discriminant can be positive ( 2 distinct real roots - meaning 2 cutting point in the x axis)
3. Discriminant can be negative ( 2 complex roots - meaning NO cutting point in x-axis)
Thus, when a graph has 2 x-intercepts, it will have positive discriminant & when a graph has NO x-intercepts, it will have negative discriminant.
Answer:
26cm
Step-by-step explanation:
because 2 radius equal 1 diameter
