The headline itself is racist in nature. The headline is meant to strike balance but in the diction of the report, there is element of racism in it.
<h3>Why is the headline racist in nature?</h3>
The headline is bias through name calling such as Negroes and White. Hence, the headline is like using dirt to clean dirts. The reporter is also bias in his choice of words, so, both the report and the headline are racist in nature.
Therefore, the reaction to such report is negative and pessimistic.
learn more about racism: brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
It would be very difficult to argue that one person/event can accurately summarize the huge political, social, and economic changes that took place during this era. One must consider that this time period saw the anti-war movement, civil rights movement, environmental movement, and parts of the women's rights movement. No one person or event involved all of these different changes at once.
However, if you were to make this argument you could use the following:
a) Martin Luther King Jr.- His role in the Civil Rights movement and peace movement make him one of the biggest civil rights icons of the 21st century.
b) March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom- This 1963 march included hundreds of thousands of Americans and allowed MLK to give his "I have a dream speech."
Answer:
My short answer is no.
Explanation:
However, I believe this question is a little bias depending on who you ask. Theoretically, I believe that this event can also be classified as a revolution. I think this because the war was a defining point for the freedom of slaves in America. Let me know if you need more clarification.
Answer:
During its classical period, Japan was highly influenced by Chinese culture. The influence of Buddhism, Confucianism, and other elements of Chinese culture had a profound impact on the development of Japanese culture. ... Then they create a cultural synthesis which is uniquely Japanese.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
