Answer:
This is what made the most sense to me :
1. My bed felt comfortable, as I slept soundly through the night.
2. The cave tour sounded more fun, after we ate a good breakfast.
3. The brochure gave us directions, before we left for the cave tour.
4. My camera dropped and broke, as I climbed into the car.
5. The clouds started forming, while we waited in Lomé for the tour.
I think it is Topic avoidance
In a thesis statement, you need to include the reasons that will support you claim.
Try asking asking yourself the basic questions of: why? how? when? where? who? what?
If it is very an essay, I always try to stay at three reasons, as it usually helps to keep stability within the paper instead of making it sound choppy or too wordy. Make sure to always expound on your reasons and give lots of detail.
Remember: Evidence, and to try and use other methods such as Ethos, Pathos, and Logos
Answer:
C. He uses reversal to show that dictators do not abide by their principles.
A. He uses parody to show how dictators deflect blame to others.
Explanation:
George Orwell's "Animal Farm" (1945) is an allegorical novella. It satirizes the soviet government of Russia under the leadership of Joseph Stalin. Napoleon is characterized as leader similar to Joseph Stalin, while Squealer is characterized as Vyacheslav Molotov (Soviet's diplomat and foreign minister).
The most correct option is C. Napoleon has clearly abandons his original stance against windmill. So it shows that dictators do not abide by their principles.
The second closest option is A. Napoleon with the help of Squealer blames Snowball of stealing Napoleon's plan to build a windmill. This strategy devalues Snowball's character in the minds of naive animals of the farm.
Option B is totally incorrect, because loyalty rewarded is not a bad thing and hence not a satire. Moreover there is no emphasis on such thing in this passage. Dogs are shown just as dictator's use of power to achieve their goals.
Option D is also totally incorrect because Squealer is very wise strategist and persuasive speech maker. He is in no way a naive character, neither a follower but one of the leaders.
Option E is also incorrect because the naive animals of the farms accept the explanation only because of fear of dictator's use of power (dogs).
Answer:
<u>Polonius tells Reynaldo to give Laertes money and "notes". He tells Reynaldo to talk to other people in France and suggest that Laertes is gambling, drinking, fencing, swearing, fighting, & sleeping around. If someone agrees then it confirms Laertes is misbehaving and if they don't agree then he is behaving.</u>
