Answer:
From -2<x<-1, the function F(X) is increasing. (B)
Really, it increases all from around -2.5<x<0.5
C is also the second answer, as it increases til around 2.5
It is decreasing from -4<x<-3. But increases right after. It then starts to slow down around x = 1 and go down again.
Which means (B) is your answer.
If you want to get fancy, its a polynomial and if you take the derivative for instantaneous rate, you will see f prime is increasing if you make an example function.
Slope = change in y / change in x
= (8 - -3) / (1 - 2) = (8 + 3) / ( 1 - 2)
= 11 / -1
= -11
Slope is negative.
Answer:
yes it can fit
Step-by-step explanation:
the tv is less than 96 inches tall
Carlos is correct
Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.
Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.
This is actually easy, because you just have to add up the 25 +15 and that would get you 40. Then you would have to add 20 to the 40 and that would be 60, so that would make 40/60 chance that she wouldn't get blue.
And if you need it in a percentage, then you can just convert this into a percentage which would be, 66.666666666667%, also known as 66.67%