Answer:
what is the answer choice
Answer: While the Pope had granted Spain sovereignty over the New World, de Las Casas argued that the property rights and rights to their own labor still belonged to the native peoples. Natives were subjects of the Spanish crown, and to treat them as less than human violated the laws of God, nature, and Spain.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The policy's main principle was that of non-intervention and non-interference in the domestic affairs of Latin America. It also reinforced the idea that the United States would be a "good neighbor" and engage in reciprocal exchanges with Latin American countries.
The policy's success was measured in part by the rapidity with which most Latin American states rallied to the Allies during World War II. After the war, however, U.S. anticommunist policies in Europe and Asia led to renewed distrust in the Americas and the gradual lapse of the Good Neighbor Policy.
Answer:
That form of government is socialism.
Explanation:
Socialism is based off the concept of total harmony, the people usually share a lot of benefits, which are often regulated by the government though. Sadly most socialist values are not reflected in their society as the usually end up flawed. Monarchies do not equally distribute power to the people. In free enterprise, private businesses compete for superiority and are not regulated strongly by the government. They don't share goods and services however, and do not relate to any system of power throughout the people. I hope this helps :)
Answer:
no he wasnt
Sure he removes the Royalty and all, but he never manages to do better in the ruling. He was power crazy, he kill those who disagree with him and use people to maintain his power, and all his promise for prosperity never achieved in his lives. Heck, he actually loses his first election and calls it void. He was a tyrannical ruler that are only slightly better than the old royalty, and better than Stalin who came after him.
He is not exactly the best example of a hero is. He is more of an idealist, and not cut out as a ruler, and he should never have come into power. Maybe as revolutioner, he is good and all but the person who should come into power should have been someone else.
