Answer:
The energy input required for making organic compounds equals the usable energy output of respiration.
Explanation:
A reaction is endergonic (energy-consuming) process if the change in free energy is positive.
A positive change in free energy implies that energy is required to enter into the system. Let us recall that free energy is a state function. Hence, change free energy =free energy of products - free energy of reactants.
If free energy of products > free energy of reactants then the reaction is an endergonic (energy-consuming) process..
But The energy input required for making organic compounds equals the usable energy output of respiration, hence making the process spontaneous.
Answer:
Social mobility is an issue that should be of interest to States, since a country where mobility is fluid leverages its human capital by allowing its citizens to develop their potential, where the primary success factor in a country with a high mobility rate social is personal merit, what is known as meritocracy; The type of system that the whole country craves. If we know that our efforts will be recognized and rewarded, we try harder and with that the states aspire to have enterprising citizens.
Now, in this understanding of ideas, in a country without social mobility the consequences are the opposite. If merit is not rewarded and our economic destiny is predetermined since we were born, why study? Why work? Why work? Hope is lost. A country without social mobility is in danger of generating frustration and resentment, which, in extreme cases, could even cause social instability.
Based on the above, we can define mobility as the possibility that people have to move up or down in the socioeconomic welfare scale. In a country it is important to have opportunities for social mobility to build a more just, integrated and efficient society (ESRU, 2008).
Thus, when we talk about social mobility we refer to the changes that people experience with respect to other individuals in the socioeconomic well-being scale of a country, and in this understanding we understand that it is positive that mobility is positively given in a country. social, since without this the chances of someone improving their economic situation in relation to others, affected by their individual capacity, are so small. That is why we will analyze the types of social mobility that they can present in a society
Answer: The diagrams above show an area that <u>was once a pasture</u> that has since undergone changes to the <u>vegetation </u>over time.
The following changes in the <u>hydrologic cycle</u> is most likely to occur as a result of the change in vegetation in the area:
Explanation:
When we <em>lose vegetation</em> in an area we face serious problems, one of them is the decreased precipitation . If changes are <em>made by man</em>, for example, as in deforestation, the consequences are <u>even worse.</u>
<u><em>Deforestation </em></u>can cause a serious <u>reduction of rainfall</u> in the tropics, with serious consequences for the population not only in that region but in <em>neighboring areas.</em> The air that passes over large areas of tropical forest produces at least twice as much rain as that which travels over areas of low vegetation .
In turn this also <u>affects the other factors</u> of the cycle. The vegetation <em>contributes</em> moisture through an <em>evapotranspiration process</em>, as it is called the evaporation of the rivers together with the transpiration of the plants. This moisture is transported by the winds.
We can say then that <u><em>the loss of vegetation</em></u> in an area (whether on purpose or not) <u><em>will corrupt several cycle factors</em></u>, mainly damaging the rainfall rate.
Answer:
Only options A (first one) reflects the instances with valid experiment or conclusion.
Quality of any experiment depends upon two things reliability and validity. Reliability is measure of regeneration of results every time an experiment is performed under specific conditions.
Validity is measure of accuracy of results of an experiment. It can be check by two ways: internal validity (checks the design of the experiment) and external validity (checks if the conclusion is the real explanation of the phenomenon).
Now, in marine biologist experiment, he concluded the results only after one breeding season. This makes his results unreliable as it might have happened by chance.
Similarly, in cola experiment the taste was only checked by one candidate i.e. Karl. He might have problem in his taste buds. In addition, the temperature of cola can also affects its taste which is not taken care of in the experiment. Hence, it is not the valid experiment.
Similarly. Jeanette could use more plants for her experiment and Robert just followed only one instruction. He didn't perform any experiment.
<h2>
* BRAINLIEST WOULD BE V APRECIATED :) </h2>
Explanation:
c is an acid I think but it may not be right
