Answer:
B)
Explanation:
Second bank of the usa act
Answer:
To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful.
The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's.
Explanation:
On Edge 2020.
Answer:
Tyrants and monarchs caused much discontent among the city states, and decided that something had to be done. Each city state slowly shifted to new form of government, such as democracy for Athens, and an aristocracy for other city states.
Explanation:
Answer:
The relationship between the Multiplier (K) and Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is that, the multiplier relies on the MPC (Marginal Propensity to Consume) in an open economy. So, if there is an increase in the MPC it will eventually be an increase in the Multiplier and vice verse
