Jehoiakim cut to pieces and burned the scroll written by Jeremiah because it predicted ______ the Captivity.

History

1 answer:

Stels [109]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: The Captivity of Judah.

Explanation:

Jehoiakim had been put into power by the Egyptian King, Pharaoh Nico who had defeated Judah as he marched to face the Babylonians. When the Babylonians defeated the Egyptians, Jehoiakim became a vassal to Nebuchadnezzar I of Babylon.

Jeremiah was a renowned prophet in Judah at the time and prophesied that due to Jehoiakim's many sinful ways, Judah would fall and be captured. This came to pass when Jehoiakim rebelled against the Babylonians and Nebuchadnezzar came and defeated Judah and killed Jehoiakim.

You might be interested in

What was the main purpose of the GI Bill?

Lelu [443]

Answer:

To help returning U.S. servicemen get back on their feet

5 0

3 years ago

Which international issues are most important to you?

Gemiola [76]

Answer:

Racism

Explanation:

People of color need to be treated with more respect.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following best describes a reason why England wanted to establish colonies in North America?

Andrej [43]

Answer:

The answer to your question would be A

Explanation:

Common Sense...

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

All of these groups still faced discrimination in America during the war effort except

kozerog [31]

Answer:

woman i believe but which war are we specking about?

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read the excerpt from "I Believe in a British Empire” by Joseph Chamberlain.

3241004551 [841]

Answer:

B. Chamberlain and Nehru both appeal to the economic interests of their audience, but Chamberlain is appealing to a desire for power, while Nehru is appealing to a sense of social justice.

Explanation:

From the above passage it is evident that Chamberlain has failed to comprehend a united India, while on the other hand Nehru is more focused on delivering social justice to each and everyone. It is evident that Chamberlain has a pessimistic tone about the entire concept of “unity in diversity”. He believed that it was a utopian idea to unite a nation that’s so diverse and in pieces. On the other hand Nehru believed in this very utopian idea of one nation.

4 0

4 years ago